This Dawg is Going on a “Reconnaissance Mission”

recon column intro copyWe’ll be introducing a new feature on Montlake Madness in the next 24 hours and I’m excited. Let me tell you about it.

Your response to Husky player interviews has been tremendous, which led me to two thoughts regarding this site:

1. I should do more player interviews with current and former Husky ballers. Got it. That’s clear to me, and it’s really a matter of coordinating schedules, and getting in touch with players willing to spend a little time talking to Montlake Madness. I’m working on setting things up, and you’ll see the results as they happen.

2. There’s only 12 players on the Huskies, so, even if we aim to speak to everyone on the team, and a few of the fan favorites of the past, that’s still not a hell of a lot of interviews. If you like interviews, I want to give you interviews.

So, we’ll be introducing a new feature on the site this weekend called “Reconnaissance Mission,” in which we’ll talk to an opposing Pac-10 player about their own team, their thoughts on the Huskies, and their experience as a college ballplayer.

Here’s why I’m psyched about this: We know so much about our guys, and we should. If you’re a die-hard like me, you’re going to watch the Huskies play about 30 times this season and it’d be impossible not to learn about our guys, and form impressions of them based on what you see, right or wrong. But, how much do you know about, say, Oregon, other than their top two or three guys? You’re going to spend at least four hours of your life this year watching, say, ASU or Stanford during their two games with the Dawgs. But, unless you’ve got the time to seek out all the Pac-10 coverage out there, you’re really only going to be super-familiar with their guys who earn national attention. Also, FSN broadcasts a lot of non-Dawg Pac-10 games. I enjoy those games, but think we’d all enjoy them even more if we knew something about the guys on the court.

In short: know thy enemy.

So, we’re going to try to get some insight into some of our opponents. If you’re not interested, read anyway. These kids work hard on the court, and they all have their story. I’m going to try to get to the bottom of it. Or, at least, find out what they think about the Dawgs. Stay tuned…

Hey, thanks for coming!

Tags:

  1. uwhoop’s avatar

    Thanks for putting this site together. This has quickly become my favorite place to browse for reading about the Huskies. The Seattle Times’ blog is always good, but I commend you for your frequent updates and ORIGINAL CONTENT, which is severely lacking elsewhere. Good work.

  2. Themod’s avatar

    Thanks, UWHoop! Comments like yours make it a lot of fun to keep the site going and growing!

  3. Paul’s avatar

    I agree with UWhoop.

    First though, 11 current huskies?

    QPon
    MBA
    Overton
    I.T.
    Gant
    Breshers
    Gaddy
    Wilcox
    Trent
    Holiday
    Turner
    Suggs

    That’s 12, right?

    Second, I’d be curious if you learn anything regarding players off-season commitments. Dentmon was evidence a year ago what one off-season of extra hard work can lead to…any idea as to which Huskies have had similar discipline this off-season?

    Keep up the great work!

  4. GrantUW’s avatar

    Paul,

    If you check out any of Tyresse Breshers facebook videos, there are several of him and a hand full of other guys (Breshers, Gant, Holiday, IT, and Suggs) hitting the gym at 4am during Spring quarter. I am sure other guys are working hard too, but it wouldn’t shock me at all if the player that nobody thought would contribute that much or improves the most next season comes out of that group.

  5. Themod’s avatar

    You’re absolutely right, Paul. I didn’t count and figured “full team minus Garcia.” Thanks for pointing it out, and I made the change.

    Really appreciate the comment.

    Re: Commitment in the off-season, Grant is right regarding that group. I’ve also heard a lot of good things about MBA looking much stronger and having his head in a better place this year. As I’ve written, my money is on Justin Holiday making a leap this season that could lead to him being someone we’re counting on for a lot of scoring by next season. Can’t wait to find out…

  6. Paul’s avatar

    Thank you Grant for that info.

    The Mod – I wasn’t purposely trying to be anal…I was more concerned you knew something I missed and it was down to 12.

    BTW – I didn’ t comment previously on your Holiday write-up because I don’t want to risk the ire of those who are sold on Holiday…but I’m not.

    First, I too am a tremendous fan of his game. I love his effort, zeal, defensive abilities and most of all, his passing. But where you attribute his lack of offense to the coach, I attribute it to lack of ability. I just am not sold he can be an offensive threat. I’ve seen nothing to indicate he has the rudimentary abilities to develop a consistent jump shot nor the ball handling skills to drive and create/finish.

    Because of that, my bet is it is either Elston Turner, Suggs or even Wilcox who play a larger role this coming season. Turner for one has shown similar court intelligence, instincts and is more of an offensive threat.

    I’d love to be wrong as I really enjoy watching and rooting on Holiday – but I don’t agree with your prediction.

  7. matt’s avatar

    yes love this site too! great job so far. Ive said many times over on the times that I think breshers will be the one to explode this year, maybe even frosh of the year if not gaddy ;)

Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>