Tyreese Breshers

You are currently browsing articles tagged Tyreese Breshers.

In recent days, Coach Romar has begun to reveal what his lineup may look like during the upcoming season. Here are some of the clues he’s given through interviews:

  • He said that Isaiah Thomas, Quincy Pondexter, and Darnell Gant would all start for the Huskies at the beginning of the upcoming season, as each did on last year’s Pac-10 championship squad.
  • Coach LoRo has also said that whichever point guard (between Abdul Gaddy and Venoy Overton) does not start will be “like a starter,” since he’ll often opt to finish games with a three-guard lineup.
  • Finally, coach has said before that it’s likely he’ll exercise a nine-man rotation again this year, which will leave three Huskies scrapping for extra minutes during blowouts, and times of foul trouble or injury.

Here’s the lineup I think Coach will use to start the season, along with the role players coming off the bench, and our explanations for each pick. You’ll notice that we’re not listing the guys in order of playing time, since there are too many unknowable factors that will go into that. We’re picking starters, role-players, and reserves.

The Starters:

aa starters copy

F/C – Matthew Bryan-Amaning

Why he should start: No one’s been a victim of higher expectations than MBA during the first two seasons of his college career, and it seems like he’s just now prepared to start making those flashes of brilliance a more regular occurrence at Hec Ed.

Why he shouldn’t: We’re being a little unfair here, given his injuries last year, but if MBA couldn’t consistently maintain a high level of intensity in about 17 minutes-per-game last year, what makes us think he can do it now for 25-30 mpg?

F – Darnell Gant

Why he should start: Because he plays solid defense, shares the ball, and hustles whenever he’s on the court. And, word out of Montlake is that Gant put on a bunch of muscle and is ready to be more of a presence near the rim on both sides of the ball this year.

Why he shouldn’t start: Because he had the worst assist-to-turnover ratio (1/2.2) of any regular player last season and shot just under 37% from the field, meaning defenders could sag off of him and clog the lane.

F – Quincy Pondexter

Why he should start: We finally saw the Quincy Pondexter we’d been waiting for during the last part of 2008/09, when Q-Pon developed into a scorer by forcing himself into the lane and getting high percentage looks at the basket, or getting himself fouled. An underrated rebounder, there’s an outside chance he could challenge for the Pac-10 lead in boards.

Why he shouldn’t start: It’s not worth struggling to come up with a reason just for the sake of writing something here.

G – Isaiah Thomas

Why he should start: I.T. is going to be the most exciting player on the court this year wherever he goes, and if he doesn’t lead the team in scoring, it will mean something’s gone horribly wrong. He’s the Husky capable of throwing a 50-spot up on the scoreboard, or laying the ball in despite a lane filled with a guy like Jarvis Varnado, or Hakeem Olajuwon, or Shaq. . . or all three.

Why he shouldn’t start: Again, he should and he will. Not much more to offer here.

G – Abdul Gaddy

Why he should start: Because the word on Gaddy is that he’s one of the best pure point guards in the world right now, and that he’s a guy who makes the game come more easily to everyone around him. Unless he gets some form of the freshman yips, and isn’t as poised or polished in reality as by reputation, the Huskies will benefit from having a true quarterback on the floor.

Why he shouldn’t start: Because for a team with aspirations of a run through the NCAA Tournament, any growing pains at all for Gaddy could result in loses that would severely hamper our seeding come March.

The Role Players:

aa reserves copy

Venoy Overton – Sixth Man

Why this role is right for him: Because Venoy was our game-changer last season, and there’s no way to quantify the energy boost he gave the team every time he stepped on the floor. It’s valid to wonder whether fouls and turnovers would go up, and the manic energy would go down, if Venoy saw 7-8 more minutes per game (last year he averaged about 20).

Dissenting opinion: Venoy is the team’s nerve center — at times, our heart and soul. Is there ever a time we don’t want his energy on the court? And, are we selling short the idea that Overton can grow as a playmaker too, using his two years of Pac-10 experience to make the battle for the starting point guard spot an absolute dawgfight?

Justin Holiday – Defensive Stopper

Why this role is right for him: Because we need someone we can bring onto the floor to ice the other team’s hot hand. With his length and speed, smaller point guards (common in the Pac-10) and huge post men (not so common in the Pac-10) are the only players Holiday will have difficulty shutting down.

Dissenting opinion: We’re a defensive-minded team, and that should be a strength regardless of the mix on the floor. Additional minutes for a shooter (like Wilcox) or a post player (Trent) may be more critical for the team than another defensive-minded sub.

Elston Turner – Marksman

Why this role is right for him: With some consistent playing time (after last season’s ankle injury Turner’s minutes-per-game dropped from 19 to 11), and a year under his belt, I’d be very surprised if Turner didn’t raise his three-point accuracy into the 40% range (from about 37% last season). He does everything well enough not to hurt us when he’s on the floor, and until someone proves differently in real game action, Turner is the option here.

Dissenting opinion: It’s hard to ignore the early whispers out of practice: that C.J. Wilcox is the team’s best shooter. If Turner doesn’t make the most out of his minutes early, Wilcox could begin to eat into his court time.

Tyreese Breshers – Reserve Big Man

Why this role is right for him: Because there are going to be games when (gasp) the Huskies are getting out-rebounded and the ghost of Jon Brockman looms large over this club. When the gameplan isn’t going our way, or our bigs are in foul trouble, Big Ty is going to be the man who gets the call.

Dissenting Opinion: Breshers was a medical redshirt last season and is just getting back to full-speed workouts. With Breshers off of a year-long injury, it’s entirely possible that Clarence Trent, who has impressed with his hustle thus far, could sneak into this role as well.

The Reserves:

aa bench copyScott Suggs, Clarence Trent, C.J. Wilcox – Bench Guys

Why this role is right for them: Trent and Wilcox are freshmen, and provided neither of them cracks the regular rotation, they’ll have the chance next year. Trent can set his sights on earning minutes vacated when Quincy Pondexter graduates, and Wilcox can bulk up and keep working on his sweet shot. Suggs is the odd man out here, still struggling in a crowded backcourt to distinguish himself.

Dissenting Opinion: It may be impossible to keep Wilcox off the court if he turns out to be a more athletic version of Ryan Appleby and truly is the team’s best shooter. The tools are there, and Trent could easily step into the backup big man role, or even a starting spot, if he can rebound well, play defense, and add an offensive element to the team that Darnell Gant doesn’t. It’s starting to sound like a familiar refrain, but Scott Suggs was Missouri’s best high school baller before he came to UW. I wouldn’t be shocked if Suggs shocks us and improves by leaps and bounds, forcing himself into the discussion.

So, that’s the lineup I think we will go with, and should go with. What do you think? Please do offer up your opinions in our comments section. We love to hear from you!

***

Finally, an announcement came yesterday from UW that a “Midnight Madness” style preseason event will be taking place on October 16th, at about 7:30 PM. A dunk contest and scrimmage are on tap, and you can bet we’ll be there soaking in every second of it.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

football basketball pic copyIn honor of college football kicking off this weekend, I thought it would be fun to do a football-themed Husky basketball post, and to get your thoughts also. Here’s the scenario:

It’s Saturday afternoon, a few hours before kickoff of the LSU game, and the Husky football team is nowhere to be found. Nothing particularly bad has happened, but the entire team is missing. Game time comes, but there’s nothing UW can do except forfeit, starting this season where they finished off last year: with a loss.

But wait. Coach Lorenzo Romar has invited every one of his players from this year’s Husky basketball team, and the last four UW hoops teams as well, to be his guests at the game. Just as Coach Sark heads toward the referee to tell him that the Dawgs will need to forfeit, Coach Romar runs onto the field and whispers an idea into his ear.

“Let my boys play,” says Coach Romar.

“You’re boys?” says Sark.

“Yes, let the basketball players suit up and play some football. They can do it. They can do anything,” Romar answers.

“You crazy, LoRo,” Sark says. “But, we’ve got no choice. Get your team of too-talls out here and let’s see what they can do.”

The only thing left then would be to take the Husky basketballers from the last five seasons and play them in the best positions on the field to produce. Sure, we’re probably looking at a losing battle against LSU. But, at least we’re not forfeiting.

If I’m Coach Sark, the following is my starting lineup. What’s yours? Send me an email to MontlakeMadness@gmail.com, and we’ll publish some of the best lineups in a future column, and name a Montlake Madness “Honorary Sark” award for the best reader-submitted lineup.

The rules are simple: only Huskies from the 2005-06 season on are eligible, players can’t start on both offense and defense. And, feel free to suggest a lineup with a 4-3 defense instead, or an additional tight end, etc.

Offense:

Abdul Gaddy – Quarterback: I know. He’s a freshman. But, if he’s going to be the QB of our hoops team, let’s give him a shot on the gridiron as well.

Isaiah Thomas – Halfback: You can barely see him moving up and down the court. Can you imagine trying to tackle him?

Clarence Trent – Fullback: Big body opens up holes and picks up blockers as necessary. Can also give us a different look ball carrier a few times during the game.

Brandon Roy – Wide Receiver: Big-time scorer does what it takes to get open and put points on the board.

Joel Smith – Wide Receiver: Under-achieving baller never lacked for athleticism. A good third option in the passing game behind Roy and J-Brock.

Jon Brockman – Tight End: I was tempted to play Jon at Center to anchor up the O-Line, which would need to quickly learn to function as a unit. But, it’s too appealing to think of him going all Tony Gonzalez on the Tiger linebackers and picking up key third-down conversions at will.

Artem Wallace and Tyreese Breshers – Offensive Tackle: Breshers was my original choice at TE, but I love the wingspans on these two keeping out rushing defensive ends.

Jamaal Williams and Phil Nelson – Offensive Guard: I like our athleticism here, although I wish we had some more size. Saving some big bodies for the defensive end, though, to give us a chance for scoring opportunities on the other side of the ball.

Joe Wolfinger – Center: Big body. Never quite looked engaged enough on the court, so a bit of a risk to have him at such a key spot on the line. That said, I think Wolfinger was under-utilized on the basketball team, and I want to rectify that on the football field.

Defense:

Matthew Bryan-Amaning and Darnell Gant – Defensive End: I like the power coming from MBA and the slick speed from Darnell coming off the line. Husky forwards teaming at DE forms maybe my favorite unit on the team.

Spencer Hawes – Nose Tackle: Big Body who looks to be tougher now than he ever looked during one season with the Huskies. And Spence is healthy now, which was never the case when he played at Hec Ed.

Scott Suggs and Elston Turner – Outside Linebacker: I like these two in here using their speed and athleticism for containment, coverage and on blitzes. A bit of a concern with their smallish frames considering the 3-4 defense we’re running.

Quincy Pondexter and Bobby Jones – Middle Linebacker: I love this unit too with Quincy’s getter-done grit and Bobby Jones’ shut-down defensive pedigree. Anything that gets past our line is getting thrashed by our MLB’s.

Justin Dentmon and C.J. Wilcox – Cornerbacks: Headiness of these two makes up for the athleticism edge they’ll give up to top flight receiving groups. But, we could count of these two not to make too many mistakes.

Justin Holiday – Strong Safety: Although stopping a tight end with a full head of steam behind him would be a challenge given Justin’s slight build, I like his combination of speed, brains and hands at the strong safety spot.

Venoy Overton – Free Safety: The biggest no-brainer on the field. He’d be on the ball before it even left the QB’s hand. I see Venoy breaking up as many passes on the gridiron as he does on the court.

Ryan Appleby – Kicker: Would (hopefully) convert his understanding of the angles into long-range marksmanship on the football field as well.

Tim Morris – Punter: Non-descript journeyman fits perfect mold for the position, and you’ve got to like his better-than-average (for a punter) speed for the occasional fake punt as well.

Your turn. Don’t use the comments section for your entry — keep your brilliant lineups to yourselves and try to win the “Honorary Sark” award without giving any ideas to your competition. (But, feel free to comment otherwise, of course, as usual…)

Thanks for coming!

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

romar mic copyHuskies’ coach, Lorenzo Romar, did a 12-minute interview with KJR Saturday morning and spoke about the incredible experience of winning the Pac-10 last season, including the fact that people seem to remember the last thing a team has done, so he feels like recruits are paying the program a little more respect after last season. He also spoke a bit about the new faces on the team this year. Listen here if you’d like, but here are some of the highlights from his appearance:

  • Coach said he thought Tyreese Breshers would be the best football player of all the Husky hoops guys, but said Venoy would be pretty good as well.
  • Also regarding Tyreese, he said he was healthy now, but had to get into shape.
  • Without mentioning them by name, Coach commented on Tony Wroten and Josh Smith playing football. He said you always have to be concerned about injury, but said he thought it was great to play multiple sports. And, he said football players usually make good defenders in basketball.
  • He called Clarence Trent “a physical specimen,” and a “high-level athlete” who hustles and will provide a lot of highlight reel stuff while at UW.
  • He said C.J. Wilcox can really create his own shot in addition to being a terrific shooter. He said he projects to be a good defensive player, while comparing him to Tre Simmons, another unheralded recruit.
  • Coach Romar called Abdul Gaddy “beyond his years,” both on the floor and off.

Thanks for coming!

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

tyreese chuck copyTyreese Breshers has the potential to really help the Huskies this season by adding some of the grit and rebounding that the frontcourt will be missing in the wake of Jon Brockman’s graduation. After redshirting last season with a shin injury, we all hope he can be more of an X-Factor this season than an X-Ray Factor.

If Breshers can be that big presence and give us 15 minutes (or more) of toughness per game, I believe our frontcourt can go from being the team’s weakness to, at least, an area of less exposure.

I caught up with Tyreese for a quick chat this afternoon and he was kind of enough to answer a few questions. Here’s some of our discussion:

MontlakeMadness: How’s the health? Are you back into playing shape?

Tyreese Breshers: My health is good, but at this point I’m not quite back in playing shape. But, I am on the road to getting back into shape.

MM: Glad to hear you’re heading in the right direction. A lot of fans are hoping you’ll be able to contribute to filling the hole left by Jon Brockman. How would you compare your game to his, style-wise?

TB: I can say, physically, I am just as strong as him and I’m good around the basket… And, like him, I like to rebound.

MM: Fantastic. Is the whole team working out together yet? Or are guys still away doing their own things for the summer?

TB: Yeah, we all have been working out together a couple months now.

MM: Nice. Anyone who’s been particularly impressive as far as improvement from last season to now?

TB: Honestly, I can see an improvement in everybody, and I’m not just saying that ’cause it sounds good.

MM: From a fan’s perspective, that’s great to hear. How do you guys handle the idea of competing for minutes on such a deep team alongside the idea of keeping team morale and unity high? Do the coaches encourage competition, or try to keep questions like ‘who’s going to start?’ out of the discussion?

TB: I think that team being so deep is only going to bring out the best in everybody, because we all know that the best players will play.

MM: Other than the Huskies, which team in the Pac-10 is the toughest?

TB: Well we aren’t going to take anybody lightly, but I would say Cal because they beat us twice and they are returning their top 3 guys.

MM: I agree with you. On paper, you guys look so much stronger, but they brought their best last season when they played UW. Tyreese, thanks for your time, man. Before you go, can you tell the fans something they don’t yet know about Tyreese Breshers?

TB: The team calls me “Chuck,” for Charles Barkley.

MM: That’s a very intriguing notion, Tyreese. Thanks so much for your time. I look forward to catching up as the season gets closer.

TB: Anytime.

Thanks for coming!

Tags: , , , ,

dunk contest pic copyWelcome to the first ever Montlake Madness slam dunk contest!

It’s the hottest day in Seattle history, so let’s check out some redonkulous dunks from the Huskies four newest players, and vote for the best.

Here’s the rules: Watch all four videos — two of them have multiple dunks, but only vote for the one I’m pointing you to. In a couple of days, I’ll post new dunks from the two top votegetters, and we’ll vote once more for the Montlake Madness UW Freshman Slam Dunk Champion.

If this goes well, we’ll do a full-team dunk contest later in the summer. So, take a good look, and cast your votes. And, hey, thanks for coming!

The Redonkulous Dunks:

Clarence Trent: At about 42 seconds into the video, “The Jumpman CT”

Tyreese Breshers: “The Sir Dunkamatic”

C.J. Wilcox: At about 27 seconds into the video, “The Backdoor Smackdown”

Abdul Gaddy: “The Over and Easy”

UPDATE/TECH ISSUES: There seem to be some tech issues with the poll. If you can’t vote below, please leave your vote in the comments section, and we’ll add it to the totals. Thanks!

Which is the sickest, most redonkulous dunk?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Tags: , , , , ,

qpon mao copyIn 1958, China’s leader, Mao Zedong, hatched a plan called The Great Leap Forward to catapult China from being a simple, agricultural country to an industrialized and powerful one. Mao was trying to get China into the conversation when it came to world powers, but it didn’t work — the country just wasn’t ready for it and it had disastrous results.

Last season our best four players were clearly Brockman, Dentmon, Thomas and Pondexter, with the order 1-4 being pretty debatable. I rank Quincy third, ahead of I.T., when it comes to overall contribution. So this year, I think Q-Pon’s got to be our best guy (although I.T. will likely lead the team in scoring).

It stands to reason that lot of fans are carrying high expectations for Pondexter this season, hoping he’ll make The Great Leap Forward from solid contributor to superstar. Quincy’s a guy we’ve hoped would give us 15+ points and 6-7 boards a night for three years now, and there’s a lot of hope that his ascension to that level will help fill some of the void left by Jon Brockman and Justin Dentmon. The only problem with that is Quincy’s already made this leap.

First, take a look at his stats from the past three seasons:

q stats 1 copy

It’s easy to see why we’d look for a lot of improvement in Quincy’s senior season in order for the Huskies to have a chance at repeating the magic and having a truly special team. But, Quincy’s surprising leap was actually a huge reason we were such a special team last year.

Check out his stats now with last year broken up as if it were two seasons:

q stats 2 copy

Quincy had a particularly poor first half of the season last year, so his full year stats don’t really tell the story of the Q-Pon we saw during the heat of the Pac-10 Championship battle and the NCAA Tournament.

So, what does this all mean?:

Will “The Real Q-Pon” please stand up? I’m coming into this year assuming (hoping, really) that Quincy’s stats from February and March represent “The Real Q-Pon.” If that’s the case, we should be able to look for an average of at least 15 points and 7 rebounds. And, then, assuming normal improvement between his junior and senior seasons, maybe 17 and 8 isn’t out of reach.

We want the ball in his hands. The 2nd half Quincy was a much more efficient player, raising his scoring about 6 points, but only shooting about 3 more times per game. Any coach in the country takes that ratio. And, looking outside the numbers, Coach ensured ball was in his hands during some of our most key possessions down the stretch last year.

We need more. This also tells me that we’re going to need someone else to take the leap. Quincy’s really a known quantity at this point in his career, and I fully expect him now to lead the team in key statistical categories, provide leadership, and have the ball in his hands when it matters. So, while he and Isaiah will be the team’s stars, there’s a lot of contribution hanging in the balance.

What the numbers can’t say. One question I have is why Quincy made such a leap in the second half of last season? While it’s always admirable to see a player improve during the conference season, what caused him to step it up so drastically? Did Q-Pon’s improvement stem from a lack of pressure on him as the focal point. Did his comfort level improve once it was clear that he was the fourth option as far as scoring the basketball? Was this the first time since becoming a Husky that the expectation of what Quincy Pondexter would do finally matched what he could do?

One thing is certain, though, Quincy Pondexter’s Great Leap Forward last season didn’t turn out nearly as badly as Mao’s did in China. Like I said, I believe it was his play that gave us the unexpected surge we needed down the stretch. Where, though, will this year’s much-needed pleasant surprise come from?

Will MBA step it up and become the low-post force we’ve been begging him to be? Will Elston Turner let it fly to the tune of several big threes every contest? Or will one of our new additions, say, Tyreese Breshers, quickly establish himself as a third scoring option on the team? I’ll share my thoughts on this in the coming days and weeks, but I’d love to hear what you think. Drop a comment if you get a chance.

And, hey, thanks for coming!

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Newer entries »