<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Plus/Minus Stats from Cal State Northridge Game</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.montlakemadness.com/plusminus-stats-from-cal-state-northridge-game/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.montlakemadness.com/plusminus-stats-from-cal-state-northridge-game/</link>
	<description>The Fan Site for UW Husky Basketball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:40:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: uwhoop</title>
		<link>http://www.montlakemadness.com/plusminus-stats-from-cal-state-northridge-game/comment-page-1/#comment-2083</link>
		<dc:creator>uwhoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 22:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.montlakemadness.com/?p=2637#comment-2083</guid>
		<description>Using the adjusted +/- stat would be a lot more useful. Simply having the raw data is, I think, a bit misleading. For example, if there were one player who played the entire game without being substituted, yet his team lost by 2 points at the end, he would have a -2 rating. However if his teammate played only the last 5 minutes of a game and was present when the team went on a big run to make the game close, he might end up with a +12 or something, even if he finished with 2 points while the player who played the whole game finished with 35.

However, because college basketball players play so few games compared to NBA players it doesn&#039;t make a whole lot of sense to try to calculate adjusted +/- for the sport. Even accurately calculating scores for the NBA takes data from multiple seasons into account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using the adjusted +/- stat would be a lot more useful. Simply having the raw data is, I think, a bit misleading. For example, if there were one player who played the entire game without being substituted, yet his team lost by 2 points at the end, he would have a -2 rating. However if his teammate played only the last 5 minutes of a game and was present when the team went on a big run to make the game close, he might end up with a +12 or something, even if he finished with 2 points while the player who played the whole game finished with 35.</p>
<p>However, because college basketball players play so few games compared to NBA players it doesn&#8217;t make a whole lot of sense to try to calculate adjusted +/- for the sport. Even accurately calculating scores for the NBA takes data from multiple seasons into account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Themod</title>
		<link>http://www.montlakemadness.com/plusminus-stats-from-cal-state-northridge-game/comment-page-1/#comment-2075</link>
		<dc:creator>Themod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 16:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.montlakemadness.com/?p=2637#comment-2075</guid>
		<description>The numbers &lt;em&gt;do &lt;/em&gt;reflect the Huskies&#039; performance with a player on the court (+25 means the team was 25 points better than CSUN with that player on the court). There&#039;s a reason, though, that pro teams use &quot;adjusted plus/minus,&quot; which tells a more complete story. I&#039;m working on my own understanding of the adjusted stat, and seeing if we can work it into Montlake Madness.

Sorry I don&#039;t have a better explanation for now... I love the stats -- always have -- but am far from an expert at this point.

Thanks,
Josh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The numbers <em>do </em>reflect the Huskies&#8217; performance with a player on the court (+25 means the team was 25 points better than CSUN with that player on the court). There&#8217;s a reason, though, that pro teams use &#8220;adjusted plus/minus,&#8221; which tells a more complete story. I&#8217;m working on my own understanding of the adjusted stat, and seeing if we can work it into Montlake Madness.</p>
<p>Sorry I don&#8217;t have a better explanation for now&#8230; I love the stats &#8212; always have &#8212; but am far from an expert at this point.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Josh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quack</title>
		<link>http://www.montlakemadness.com/plusminus-stats-from-cal-state-northridge-game/comment-page-1/#comment-2069</link>
		<dc:creator>quack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 09:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.montlakemadness.com/?p=2637#comment-2069</guid>
		<description>i agree with magglio... is this the amount the huskies were up or down by for the time each player was on the court?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree with magglio&#8230; is this the amount the huskies were up or down by for the time each player was on the court?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magglio</title>
		<link>http://www.montlakemadness.com/plusminus-stats-from-cal-state-northridge-game/comment-page-1/#comment-2067</link>
		<dc:creator>Magglio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 06:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.montlakemadness.com/?p=2637#comment-2067</guid>
		<description>im confused. can you explain what these stats tell us again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im confused. can you explain what these stats tell us again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A-Dub</title>
		<link>http://www.montlakemadness.com/plusminus-stats-from-cal-state-northridge-game/comment-page-1/#comment-2066</link>
		<dc:creator>A-Dub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 04:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.montlakemadness.com/?p=2637#comment-2066</guid>
		<description>Josh,

First off, I want to say that I love your blog, and I really like that you&#039;re attempting some more in-depth statistical analysis. It looks like the plus/minus is becoming a recurring feature. In the spirit of helping you improve your product, I have a piece of constructive criticism. The claim that a +12 rating for the last game is average is misleading. The true average is &quot;+12 pts per 40 min played.&quot; The &quot;expected&quot; plus/minus for any given player should be the score differential (+12 in this case) times the fraction of the game played by that player.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh,</p>
<p>First off, I want to say that I love your blog, and I really like that you&#8217;re attempting some more in-depth statistical analysis. It looks like the plus/minus is becoming a recurring feature. In the spirit of helping you improve your product, I have a piece of constructive criticism. The claim that a +12 rating for the last game is average is misleading. The true average is &#8220;+12 pts per 40 min played.&#8221; The &#8220;expected&#8221; plus/minus for any given player should be the score differential (+12 in this case) times the fraction of the game played by that player.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

