<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pac-10 Season Preview, Part II: The Teams</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.montlakemadness.com/pac-10-season-preview-part-ii-the-teams/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.montlakemadness.com/pac-10-season-preview-part-ii-the-teams/</link>
	<description>The Fan Site for UW Husky Basketball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 04:53:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Montlake Madness &#183; Pac-10 Mini-Preview: What We&#8217;ve Learned So Far</title>
		<link>http://www.montlakemadness.com/pac-10-season-preview-part-ii-the-teams/comment-page-1/#comment-2431</link>
		<dc:creator>Montlake Madness &#183; Pac-10 Mini-Preview: What We&#8217;ve Learned So Far</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 12:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.montlakemadness.com/?p=1835#comment-2431</guid>
		<description>[...] have impressed, and some have fallen flat on their faces. Here&#8217;s what we had to say about the Pac-10 in our season preview, and here&#8217;s what we&#8217;ve learned about each team [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have impressed, and some have fallen flat on their faces. Here&#8217;s what we had to say about the Pac-10 in our season preview, and here&#8217;s what we&#8217;ve learned about each team [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Montlake Madness &#183; Pac-10 Roundup: Season Openers</title>
		<link>http://www.montlakemadness.com/pac-10-season-preview-part-ii-the-teams/comment-page-1/#comment-1656</link>
		<dc:creator>Montlake Madness &#183; Pac-10 Roundup: Season Openers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.montlakemadness.com/?p=1835#comment-1656</guid>
		<description>[...] This morning: a brief capsule review of how the rest of the Pac-10 fared in their games to start the season. It&#8217;s early, but maybe not too early to feel awesome about my assessment that Oregon State is vastly overrated at this point. . . or to feel really iffy about .... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This morning: a brief capsule review of how the rest of the Pac-10 fared in their games to start the season. It&#8217;s early, but maybe not too early to feel awesome about my assessment that Oregon State is vastly overrated at this point. . . or to feel really iffy about &#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Montlake Madness · Pac-10 Season Preview, Part II: The Teams &#124; College Sports Nation</title>
		<link>http://www.montlakemadness.com/pac-10-season-preview-part-ii-the-teams/comment-page-1/#comment-1308</link>
		<dc:creator>Montlake Madness · Pac-10 Season Preview, Part II: The Teams &#124; College Sports Nation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.montlakemadness.com/?p=1835#comment-1308</guid>
		<description>[...] from: Montlake Madness · Pac-10 Season Preview, Part II: The Teams  addthis_url = [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from: Montlake Madness · Pac-10 Season Preview, Part II: The Teams  addthis_url = [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Molly</title>
		<link>http://www.montlakemadness.com/pac-10-season-preview-part-ii-the-teams/comment-page-1/#comment-1275</link>
		<dc:creator>Molly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 20:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.montlakemadness.com/?p=1835#comment-1275</guid>
		<description>The UW Dawg Pack official twitter is up and running. Follow for updates on what the Pac 10&#039;s best student section has up their sleeves for every home game, including posters to look for, chants to listen for, team updates and all the dirt on our opponents. 

http://twitter.com/UWDawgPack</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The UW Dawg Pack official twitter is up and running. Follow for updates on what the Pac 10&#8242;s best student section has up their sleeves for every home game, including posters to look for, chants to listen for, team updates and all the dirt on our opponents. </p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/UWDawgPack" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/twitter.com/UWDawgPack?referer=');">http://twitter.com/UWDawgPack</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BRETT</title>
		<link>http://www.montlakemadness.com/pac-10-season-preview-part-ii-the-teams/comment-page-1/#comment-1273</link>
		<dc:creator>BRETT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.montlakemadness.com/?p=1835#comment-1273</guid>
		<description>I think you are underestimating Arizona. Lots of talent....and an experienced leader in the backcourt. 

My top ten : 

1. Huskies - no Brockman? No problem. 
2. Cal - top 25 team, but they can&#039;t run with the dawgs. 
3. Arizona - young guns will step up. Make it 27 in a row. 
4. UCLA - always well coached and talented. 
5. Oregon - Fifth Pac-10 NCAA team 
6. Washington St. -  miss the tourney, but close.
7. Oregon St. - they suck. 
8. USC - they suck. 
9. Arizona St. - they suck 
10. Stanford - they really suck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are underestimating Arizona. Lots of talent&#8230;.and an experienced leader in the backcourt. </p>
<p>My top ten : </p>
<p>1. Huskies &#8211; no Brockman? No problem.<br />
2. Cal &#8211; top 25 team, but they can&#8217;t run with the dawgs.<br />
3. Arizona &#8211; young guns will step up. Make it 27 in a row.<br />
4. UCLA &#8211; always well coached and talented.<br />
5. Oregon &#8211; Fifth Pac-10 NCAA team<br />
6. Washington St. &#8211;  miss the tourney, but close.<br />
7. Oregon St. &#8211; they suck.<br />
8. USC &#8211; they suck.<br />
9. Arizona St. &#8211; they suck<br />
10. Stanford &#8211; they really suck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
