<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Would the Pac-10 Look if Every Player Stayed Four Years?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.montlakemadness.com/how-would-the-pac-10-look-if-every-player-stayed-four-years/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.montlakemadness.com/how-would-the-pac-10-look-if-every-player-stayed-four-years/</link>
	<description>The Fan Site for UW Husky Basketball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:40:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilkdawg</title>
		<link>http://www.montlakemadness.com/how-would-the-pac-10-look-if-every-player-stayed-four-years/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilkdawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 05:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.montlakemadness.com/?p=83#comment-73</guid>
		<description>I think another point your post makes is that the Pac-10 would be the best conference in the country.  We all know the succes the Pac-10 has had with lottery and 1st round picks the last couple years.  I read that over the past two years, the Pac-10 has 21 guys drafted, the next best league was 13, and most conferences have more than 10 teams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think another point your post makes is that the Pac-10 would be the best conference in the country.  We all know the succes the Pac-10 has had with lottery and 1st round picks the last couple years.  I read that over the past two years, the Pac-10 has 21 guys drafted, the next best league was 13, and most conferences have more than 10 teams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Themod</title>
		<link>http://www.montlakemadness.com/how-would-the-pac-10-look-if-every-player-stayed-four-years/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Themod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 23:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.montlakemadness.com/?p=83#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Very good point. I guess I was going by sheer talent... You&#039;re totally right, there aren&#039;t enough basketballs for all of those dudes to be happy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good point. I guess I was going by sheer talent&#8230; You&#8217;re totally right, there aren&#8217;t enough basketballs for all of those dudes to be happy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.montlakemadness.com/how-would-the-pac-10-look-if-every-player-stayed-four-years/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 23:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.montlakemadness.com/?p=83#comment-8</guid>
		<description>USC would be may be the preseason #1 with that lineup, but by the end of the Pac-10 schedule they&#039;d be an unremarkable 4th or 5th place Pac-10 team.  Chemistry issues, self-play, and inconsistency have caused them to consistently under-perform.

The season low-light would be the locker room brawl between Lewis and Hackett after they get upset 26-24 by Washington State.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>USC would be may be the preseason #1 with that lineup, but by the end of the Pac-10 schedule they&#8217;d be an unremarkable 4th or 5th place Pac-10 team.  Chemistry issues, self-play, and inconsistency have caused them to consistently under-perform.</p>
<p>The season low-light would be the locker room brawl between Lewis and Hackett after they get upset 26-24 by Washington State.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

