The California Bears (16-8) smacked the Washington Huskies (16-8) in the mouth at Haas Pavilion in Berkeley, California on Thursday night. (So, why does my jaw hurt?) Cal shot the lights out in a 93-81 win that really wasn’t even that close. In the biggest game of the year, the Huskies were unimpressive. The road curse continues.
The Huskies came out with a bit more energy than in recent road losses, but ran out of steam late in the first half. Cal went on a run and led by 15 or more during most of the rest of the game. The Huskies made a semi-run late, but it wasn’t nearly enough and the game was never in question.
Recapping this game isn’t really necessary—and frankly, I can’t recap it because I will vomit. If you didn’t see it, you lucked out. But, if you did catch either of the Huskies’ games in the desert, or the beat-down against USC, then you know what happened in this game because it was a déjà vu Huskies road loss:
- We don’t play team basketball and take crazy shots while running, spinning, or falling backward. I think I saw Venoy try to shoot one while dancing. We share the ball at home; we hog the ball on the road. We attack the basket at home; we fade away from it on the road.
- We don’t play with enthusiasm or aggressiveness on the road. We look terrified.
- Somebody on the other team has the best game of their career during every road loss. (In this case, it was Randlel, who was nothing short of UNBELIEVABLE.)
- We start to play well when we look up at the scoreboard and realize we are no longer close enough to win the game.
I want to make sure I say something positive for all you fans that are hurting out there. So here it goes: Matthew Bryan-Amaning played a really good game. Not only was he physical in the post, he actually made some shots and was one of the few Huskies who seemed to play hard every minute he was in the game.
Quincy Pondexter always gives 100% effort and is fearless, but he didn’t have it tonight. The rest of the Huskies played tentative basketball, waiting for someone to bail them out, but nobody did. The following are the negative thoughts in my head right now. I put them in italics for all you “on the ledge” Husky fans. Don’t read the italics if you don’t want to feel even worse than you do right now.
Tyreese Breshers was a non-factor. Justin Holiday laid brick after brick. Scott Suggs was Scott Suggs circa 2008. Isaiah Thomas played well offensively, but played lazy defense. He was completely outplayed by Randle, who scored 33 and is the most impressive player I have seen in the Pac-10 this year, not named Quincy Pondexter. Abdul Gaddy was horrible—this was his worst game: bad decisions offensively, lost on defense, and I hold him personally responsible for the 8-0 Cal run late in the first half. Abdul turned it over, took a wild shot, and lost his man on three consecutive possessions. And THAT run was the one the Huskies never recovered from. Venoy shot well from the line again, but was horrible defensively. Somebody needs to tell him that defense is not entirely about selling out for the steal. He lets up so many easy baskets—it drives me crazy. For every steal he gets, he gives up an uncontested layup, or forces a teammate to help on his guy, leaving someone else open—usually for a three.
After the last four games, I was suckered into believing in these guys again. I really was. I still love this team, but have to vent after these road losses. If I never saw them play at home, I would watch these road games, cheer on our guys and move on. But I have seen this team play at such a high level that I just can’t stomach the way they play during these road games. Ugh!
Well, I guess these are your 2009-2010 Washington “Jekyll-and-Hyde” Huskies: a top twenty team at home and an absolute mess on the road. Which brings me to the really sad part of this post. . .
What does this loss mean?: Most significantly, we lost the Pac-10 regular season title tonight, barring an absolute miracle and a collapse of monumental proportions from Cal (who plays three of their last six games at home). Cal now has a two game lead and there just aren’t enough games left for us to catch them.
Pac-10 Tourney aside, I don’t think that anything short of winning out the regular season schedule (at Stanford, vs. USC, vs. UCLA, at Washington St., at Oregon, and at Oregon St.) is going to be enough to punch us a ticket to the Big Dance.
Do I think we can do it? Maybe. . . but it will begin (and potentially end) at Stanford on Saturday. A road win would go a long way for our confidence, and give us a chance to make a run.
Tags: Cal, Post-game story
-
Thanks for the overview…I actually couldn’t watch the game, but recorded it…saw the final score…refused to watch…may or may not delete it later.
All that to say, I appreciate reading your comments/observations. Too bad about Gaddy, I really thought he’d be coming into his own by now.
Huskies really have their backs up against the wall now, let’s see what they’re made of.
-
MBA was the lone bright spot in this one. I’m curios if everyone else feels how I do about Isaiah. He had a good offensive night as far as numbers, but I thought he kept everyone else from getting involved. Everytime he decides to take the ball to the rack, everyone else just stands around to see what happens. This was a game that we needed Quincy to be involved in early, and no one was able to get the ball to him early. That is the job of the point guard. Since IT is the one handling the ball the most, I think this falls on him. 24 points are great, but I would prefer to see him get 16 with 5 assists and keep the ball moving.
-
I agree with you GM, 100%. Why can’t we make the extra pass on the road. Mental midgets.
-
IMO our preseason ‘strength’ at the guard position was completely erroneous. Thomas has talent but it’s really more gym ball than team ball. Many of his drives result in an open man in the corner that may as well be a statue as IT is simply programmed to put it up.
I concur with your observation on Overton as well. The Hollywood on-ball defense is often followed by the knitty gritty blow by and layup or pass. The touted on-ball defense works well against SU or Cal Northridge but players of the caliber of Randle simply blow by as a general rule.
I noteced a 30 second or so zone which I do believe should be at least 5 to 10 minutes a game. The energy and intensity it takes to play Romar’s man defense just cannot be sustained for 40 minutes and any lapse produces backdoor layups, lost defenders and threes.
-
Totally agree Sam! I have been saying it all year! IT should be coming off the bench when we need a spark of offense. He is too small and gets himself in trouble too many times.
Having played JC ball and being a small guy I understand that 95% of the time he is getting fouled but he is not going to get the calls that the bigger guys get. He really needs to develope a mid-range jump shot and pass the ball!
We would have much better matchups with Qunicy playing the two and someone like Suggs or Turner playing the three. Can anyone explain to me why our highly touted freshman never live up to the hype that other big name freshman do? I am not saying Gaddy doesn’t have it, I think he has a lot of it! I think he is just on to short of a leash?
-
Anyone notice in the first half Randle just baited overton, dribbling with extended arms daring him to take it from him. Overton reached for the steal and Randle went behind the back and blew by him for the easy bucket. Randle was just toying with him.
We had no production from our 3-point specialists, but honestly Cal only had a 3 more 3s so that wasn’t that big of a factor.I am sick of Gaddy getting minutes, he plays mediocre ball, I understand trying to get him to develop but let overton/thomas split the pg minutes and add Suggs. I’d rather develop Suggs than Gaddy.
MBA has earned his starting spot back. He has improved a little but, but the reality is more that Breshers is not ready. He is not in good enough shape for DI ball. He gets winded and his feet get heavy so he has trouble keeping staying in front.
-
It’s difficult for me to understand the Breshers in shape issue. Seems to me that three + months of basketball every day plus whatever other aerobic exercise he is doing is enough to get anybody in shape. Not to say he is obviously carrying extra pounds because he is. Just don’t get it. Food issues?


7 comments
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link: http://www.montlakemadness.com/gant’s-moustache-thoughts-on-the-dawgs-critical-loss-at-cal/trackback/