In case you’ve just come back to Husky basketball after six months away, you’ve tuned in at (what we believe to be) the end of a long and dramatic recruiting effort by the Dawgs’ coaching staff to land two of the best high school ballers in the country.
The situation: The early signing period starts next Wednesday, November 11th, and runs for a week. Both Josh Smith and Terrence Jones are expected to announce their decisions during this period. If the Huskies go two-for-two, their recruiting class for 2010 will be one of the best in the country, if not the consensus #1. Even if the Huskies get one of these two likely future stars, their prospects for next season, even with the graduation of Quincy Pondexter, will likely be even higher than this year.
Josh Smith: Josh is a 6’10″ center from nearby Kentwood High School, ranked somewhere in the top five big men in the country, depending on who’s doing the ranking. ESPN currently has Josh as the #1 center in the land, and the #10 prospect overall. The good news: UW is one of the two schools Josh is still considering. The bad news: nearly all of the intel coming from the voices covering the Huskies points to Josh choosing UCLA.
The buzz on Josh: One theory says that he’s worried about cheap shots on the football field, so he doesn’t want to announce he won’t be playing at home until the gridiron season is over. Another supposition says that Josh’s mom wants UW, but his dad wants UCLA. The biggest reason to hold out hope is that Josh still hasn’t announced anything, even though UCLA has been the word for months.
Terrence Jones: Terrence Jones is a 6’8″ forward from Portland, ranked fifteenth overall by ESPN. Jones has narrowed his list to five schools: UW, Oregon, UCLA, Oklahoma and Kentucky. He takes his final visit, down to UCLA, this weekend. Jones is less of a sure bet to make his choice during the early signing period, but has crammed a whirlwind tour of five schools into a short period of time, which means there’s a good chance he’d like to get the process over with.
The buzz on Terrence: Word on the street is that UW and Oregon are in the driver’s seat, based on the thought (wishful thinking?) that he may be leaning toward staying close to home. Like Josh, Terrence has been mostly silent of late. He’s been complimentary of Coach Romar, but also of Coach Capel at Oklahoma. And, then there’s Kentucky, which can’t ever be counted out of a recruiting battle. Oh… and then there’s UCLA right there in the mix.
Here’s what I think is going to happen: I think we’re not going to get either of them.
Why I don’t think we’ll get Smith: Sometimes, where there’s smoke, there is really fire. While I don’t know which of the theories, if any, I really buy into, I just get a sense that the answer has always been UCLA, and, for whatever reason, Josh has held off announcing.
Why I don’t think we’ll get Jones: I think we have as good a shot to land Jones as any of the other schools on his list. Despite his looking glum and unexcited at UW’s Midnight Madness event, I believe he truly considers UW a distinct possibility. But, we’re one of five — that’s 20%. If I’m betting, I’m betting on the field at 80%.
Why you shouldn’t think we’re getting these guys either: Wouldn’t you rather be pleasantly surprised than bitterly disappointed? No one (read: NO ONE) really knows anything, particularly since both recruits have played things very close to the vest. The “truth” won’t exist until these kids announce and make something true. So, until then, wouldn’t you rather be excited about Desmond Simmons coming in 2010, and the fact that every player on the Dawgs, except Quincy Pondexter is likely to come back? That way, you have nowhere to go but up.
Since, like everyone else, I know absolutely nothing, that’s my mindset. What’s yours? Would love to hear whether you agree or not, so please vote in the poll above.
Thanks for coming!
Tags: Josh Smith, Terrence Jones
-
I absolutely agree with you on focusing on who HAS committed and being excited about them. I do look forward to rooting for Simmons who sounds like a very hard working high energy player…definitely someone it will be fun to cheer on.
On a separate note, talk me off the ledge regarding Turner’s performance Wed. night. I wasn’t at the game but all accounts are he played poorly and we know he came in after both Suggs & Wilcox, neither who (reportedly) showed that they can contribute much this season.
Apparently there are rumors that Suggs & Wilcox have been outplaying Turner in practice (only repeating what was stated in another blog).
If all that is true…where are Huskies going to get much needed 3 point shooting this season, not to mention some offense if IT/Pondexter are shut down. All along I’ve taken solace that Turner would be able to step in and replace the outside threat/offense that Dentmon took with him…but now I’m really wondering.
Input? Comments? Solace?
-
I fail to see the point of voting for something like this. It’s not really an opinion issue, like, say, who should be the starting point guard. Obviously one of these things will happen, and the others won’t. It’s sort of like voting on whether its going to rain tomorrow or not.
If you want predictions, which make a little more sense to me than votes, then I agree with you that niether is probably the most likely scenario of the four. But FWIW there are reasons for hope w/ both of these kids. TJ’s aunt played women’s hoops at UW; and I can’t see any reason that JS would have drug this out this long if he wasn’t giving the Dawgs serious consideration.
-
Predicition/Vote? What is the difference? The poll isn’t about what you want to have happen otherwise (assuming most on here are UW fans) all the votes would have us getting both of them. I think of the vote as an opportunity to predict what you think will happen. Sorry but your post does not make any sense. Also this issue is not like “voting on whether its going to rain tomorrow or not”. Especially considering the outcome has four as opposed to two possibilities. Also there are more reliable indicators as to whether or not it will rain tomorrow. Ask a weatherman. I don’t know if the Jones/Smith situation has that weatherman.
Go Dawgs!
Go Dawgs!
-
I heard a lot of Smith’s friends have recommended he attend the Dub…..doesn’t mean he’ll listen to them though. I don’t think peer pressure will be a factor.
-
I love it all Josh! One thing, if I were Josh and thinking UCLA, I would wonder if those guards could get me the ball. Especially if Lee leaves like the media is saying might happen. Another thing, strange things are afoot in Oregon. Will they have Kent there after this year? I know Nike, I mean Oregon has a lot of pressure to keep him in state. As long as we have Romar we will always have great recruiting. As a parent, I would want my son to play for someone with his high standards. He’s a good man.
-
I agree Gersen. I know that UCLA is UCLA and thus a big draw for a kid. But I would think that Josh Smith would have some awareness of how good the UW guards are and that they are all back next season for his one season of college ball. Hawes should give Smith a call and let him know how much it sucks to play on a team that doesn’t have a guard that can get you the ball, regardless of how good you think/know you are. UW is also seemingly in great position next season to make a run to the final four but for some solidly big man play.
-
I just read on Percy’s blog that Josh is visiting UCLA this weekend. That could be bad or good I guess but I’m leaning to bad. This visit has caught me off guard.


11 comments
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link: http://www.montlakemadness.com/decision-time-coming-for-two-prized-husky-recruits-whats-going-to-happen-vote-now/trackback/