Dawgs Lose a Tough One in “Salty 16″

Staff Writer Craig Yamada takes one more look at the Huskies’ loss on Thursday night.

by Craig Yamada – Staff Writer

Off goes Romar’s Jacket, and down go the Dawgs in the NCAA tourney. A bittersweet ending to a great season for UW Thursday as the Huskies fell to the West Virginia Mountaineers, 69-56.

Any Dawg fan who saw the game could go on at length about the many bad calls and non-calls against UW today, but in the end, the Huskies exited thedance today for one reason: They beat themselves.

22 turnovers + 0 second chance points + crucial missed free throws does not equal Elite 8.

Game Snapshot:

Much to the dismay of every UW fan, the Dawgs were bullied and outperformed in every facet of today’s game. Reminiscent of their shortcomings against Georgetown and USC, the Dawgs were outsized and outmatched by a talented Mountaineer squad. By combining carelessness with the ball and a terrible showing on the glass, the Dawgs sealed their own fate today.

Both teams stumbled out the gate as the game was sloppy from the opening tip. The teams combined for 26 turnovers in the first half, and while the half-court offense was getting little done, UW’s defense seemed to be in high gear. They stole the ball and forced WVU into bad passes leading to a bunch of transition buckets.

WVU extended their man-to-man defense far outside the perimeter to disrupt our passing lanes and shot opportunities. Our guards were unable to establish any kind of fluidity or ball movement for the entire game, and our bigs rarely got the ball in a good spot to do much. West Virginia definitely read the scouting report on UW as they took the three-point arc away as an offensive weapon for the Dawgs.  This left UW’s players to force shots in the middle of the key, only to be contested each time by WVU’s seemingly endless supply of 6’8″ or 6’9″ long-armed athletes.

Quincy Pondexter found himself in early foul trouble in the first half and wasout of sync the entire game. The Huskies were able to keep their lead through most of the first half on the back of Justin Holiday, the lone bright spot for UW. Justin played great defense all game as he forced four steals, garnered three blocks and held the highly touted Da’Sean Butler to four points in the first half. IT was the only other player for the Dawgs able to convert against WVU’s bigs in the paint as he continued to take the ball strong to the cup throughout the game.

WVU leaned heavily on their bench in the first half which garnered over a third of their offensive production. Deniz Kilicli, the 6-9 Turkish forward, seemed unstoppable in the post as he got any shot he wanted against our frontline. He also dominated the offensive glass when he was in the game during the first half.

After trailing by two at the half, West Virginia took full control in the second half as UW could not stop the relentless onslaught of 2nd chance points and clutch three pointers. Butler got going early with five straight points to open the second half, eventually finishing the game with 14 points (on 5-15 shooting). Quincy countered in the second half with four quick points. But, the man UW had no real answer for was Kevin Jones. Jones erupted for a game high 18 points in the game. He pumped in two huge three-balls in the second half to help break the backbones of the Dawgs.

Turnovers told the story of the Dawgs in the second half as our guards tried to lob all their passes over their lengthy defenders. More often than not, these resulted in tipped steals or balls knocked out of bounds. UW’s free throw shooting was abysmal as well as they shot 64% from the stripe, preventing them from ever gaining ground on WVU.

Lorenzo Romar was the recipient of a rare technical foul in an attempt to fire up his squad following a bad blocking call on Justin Holiday. The Dawgs found themselves down by 12 afterward and that four-point possession proved to be deadly for UW.

IT hit a clutch three with five minutes left in the game and momentum seemed to be returning in time for one last run. It was all for naught, though, as UW made two turnovers on consecutive possessions off the hands of their spark plug, Venoy Overton.

That spelled the end of the game for UW who let the time wind down and conceded to the Mountaineers in the closing minutes.

The Negatives

VO, the walking TO– Venoy had an elongated lapse of judgment as he forgot that the Dawgs were not wearing white uniforms today. He completely lost his head in the second half (six turnovers). So has been the story most of the year, Venoy forced circus shots and drives when UW had no numbers. These resulted in turnovers and essentially killed any momentum UW could possibly muster in this game.

22 team turnovers – Way too many lob passes today. The fundamental bounce passes completely escaped our players as an option today.

ET never got going – Elston Turner, along with most of the team, was shut down from the arc today and was forced to attack the basket. Not his game.

Not-So-Farewell for Quincy – Definitely not the kind of game that Quincy wanted to end his UW career as he was nonexistent in this game.  WVU kept him on the pine as they got him in early foul trouble.

Free Throw Shooting – For the first time this tourney the ESPN analysts made an accurate assessment as they warned our fans of UW’s free throw woes. Missing the first of several one-and-one opportunities paralyzed our comeback efforts.

What can we salvage?

Justin Holiday, the new hope? – Justin Holiday was easily our player of the game as he did everything humanly possible to keep us competitive today. He scored, rebounded and blocked shots today better than anyone else on the team. He fought to the bitter end and we all applaud his efforts today. With a little off-season help from Ryan Appleby this summer, he could really blossom for UW next year as not only the  defensive stopper, but perhaps as a third scoring option too?

The core returns – During the 10 minutes that Quincy was out in the first half, we got a brief glimpse into next year’s squad. They definitely held their own in Quincy’s absence on the shoulders of IT and Justin Holiday. Although there have been rumors about MBA testing NBA waters, today should have put those discussions to rest.  MBA should be back for a strong senior campaign next year.

Defense – The Dawgs still looked effective on defense today, despite their rebounding deficiencies. They did what they sought out to do by cutting off passing lanes and forcing turnovers. We should see more of the same from our upperclassmen next year as our best defenders (IT, Holiday and MBA) all return.

Final Thoughts

Today was hard to swallow for all of Dawg Nation, but you have to tip your hat to the Mountaineers. They played a great game and proved why they were Big East Tourney Champs. Our team had a great year and extended an almost disappointing season into an unthinkable Pac 10 Tournament championship and Sweet 16 appearance.

If some of our highly touted recruits fall our way in April, we definitely can make a return trip here next year, and perhaps get this “Salty 16″ monkey off of our backs.

Thank you Huskies, and thank you Dawg fans.

Thanks for coming!

Tags:

  1. Matt’s avatar

    “there have been rumors about MBA testing NBA waters”

    That surprises me. Where’d you hear that?

  2. howitzer’s avatar

    Nice summary Craig.

    In the ‘constructive criticism’ catagory- 1) Venoy really needs to be more consistant. This game is eerily reminicent of the Purdue game. Some of his turnovers are real headshakers. 2) Maybe Romar should have cleared out and isolated for Thomas or Qpon when the Mountaineers were man defense. 3) A bit more Gant and some Breshears against that tough front line 4) Wave the players off the court and to the locker room after the Holiday blocking foul(just kidding).

    All in all great season for us. The above are simply musings, food for thought and hindsight comments.

  3. Bcup’s avatar

    Tough, tough loss, well outlined in this article.

    On the bright side, they pulled of one hell of a great run in the last half of the season.

  4. GantsMoustache’s avatar

    This was a fun season….getting to play three NCAA tournament games is amazing from a fan perspective. Congrats to all the Huskies and the Husky fans.

    In the end, we can point to a lot of reasons we didn’t have a magical final four run, but the big one is that we are a really small team. Size matters in basketball. You can play smart, you can shoot well, but sometimes you are playing against guys that are just too damn big. Every team we have played this year that has been in this category, has dominated us (USC, Georgetown, and now WVU.)

    Oh Venoy. I have been critical of him all year long….but ironically it wasn’t until last night that I realized something: Gaddy is actually going to be good and Venoy just isn’t a starter. He is a tremendous bench player. But, as a coach, when you sense that he is losing his mind and throwing the ball all over the court like a hot potato, you need to pull him for a more reliable, more traditional, game-managing point guard. Venoy really can’t play in the last 5 minutes of a BIG game…because there is a 50/50 chance that he will lose it for you by himself.

    If Gaddy can’t be the player we all thought he could be, then IT needs to play the point with Elston at the 2 in big spots next year.

    Anyway, I digress…..great season, great run, and a very memorable Husky team. I will miss watching Q play. I hope he has a great career in the NBA. I will always cheer for him.

  5. Artie A.’s avatar

    To me, this was a First Half-Second Half story. I just had a feeling that WV would come out better prepared in the second half. Were we playing above our heads in the first half? I think it was more a matter of WV playing WORSE than us. I mean, UP by 2 without QP on the floor?? We did the same things in the second half as we did in the first, but we didn’t get away with it.

    And yes, that was a lousy call, but for Romar to risk drawing a technical . . . not good. Can you imagine if we lost by ONE POINT, and that could be traced back to the technical? Quite an oopsy.

    Anyway, great season, and great blogging Mr. Madness!

  6. Craiger’s avatar

    Hey Matt – There were a bunch of posts/rumors on the pay sites (Scout) that MBA was going to try and test NBA waters out. If he did do this, it would probably be a move to see what else he would need to work on to get to the next level next year.

    I don’t think we have anything to worry about, as MBA still has a lot to work on before he can get to the league.

  7. Venoying’s avatar

    Romars Technical was a big mistake. I think it had the opposite effect, instead of firing us up, it put them 4 pts ahead (I think he made all 4) and I think some of the players gave up. They got frustrated and made stupid mistakes. Turnovers were horrible.

    Overall it was a great season, and I am looking forward to next year.

  8. Dave’s avatar

    Good Analysis Craig must been hard reliving the game. This was a great run and it brought out the best in of our fans, school and city. I will give a standing ovation for Q, Romar and the squad. Lots of adversitities overcame this year, we have a good foundation left, and some momentum for recruiting.

    Note to Romar – No more recruiting PF’s at 6 6″ that are slow and fat. Total waste of scholarship and space. Its apparent we always run into the big east late in the tourney . We need to have the physicality to sustain. .

  9. Paul’s avatar

    Craiger, agree on MBA. Don’t they have some nba camps where players can attend to get an idea where they stand? They’re not necessarily testing waters, just gauging where they stand and where they need to improve. I have heard nothing on MBA and the NBA , but if that is what he is doing, as a junior that actually would be an excellent idea for him. No way he’s draftable right now, but I think he has a legit shot by the end of his senior season.

    I loved this line howitzer, “Wave the players off the court and to the locker room after the Holiday blocking foul”…I think we are all trying so hard to not whine about and blame the refs for the loss that we’re underselling how truly horrific that call was. I’m still ticked off.

    G-stache – I TOTALLY agree with you on Gaddy. I had nearly identical thoughts. Up until last night when I played the game of , “who starts next season” I wasn’t convinced Gaddy would start over Overton. Immediately following the game, trying to console myself by looking forward to next season, I went through ‘my’ projected starters and immediately penciled Gaddy in. and I agree with you on IT and Turner…but I betcha Gaddy is more than ready come next season.

    I also still believe that Breshers will grow into a tremendous role…he may only be 6’6…but doesn’t he have a 7’0 wing-span? I thought I heard that before. I’ve also heard that scouts look at wing-span as much or more than height because it is more reflective of their ability to dominate inside. Maybe I’m naïve but I still think Breshers can become a dominating big guy.

  10. bellingham husky’s avatar

    Tough game, finally ready to comment:)

    It’s always hard to determine if crappy play is self induced or the result of a strong opponent. I think with this one, we can assume both. Playing well they would have been a tough team to beat, but we played poorly.

    The foul trouble was key, I was really hoping that would have been a problem for WVU. Don’t want to complain about the refing, as they made some poor calls against WVU, ours seem to be momentum killers and against our key players.

    VO, you got TO SLOW IT DOWN. You probably are the fastest player on the court, but you need to learn how to probe with your speed and then make good decisions. You learn that, you will be 1st team pac 10.

    IT really grown to respect him, very good competitor. Gaddy will be all pac-10 caliber, if he doesn’t come out too early. If Holiday make the same step this off season as last, he could be all pac 10. I too think breshers will be a good college player, has the right build. MBA and Turner have lots of potential, really interesting to see what happens next year.

    Fantastic year Huskys. QPON, thanks for your dedication to the dawgs, really a class act. Good luck in the league. The rest of the dawgs, enjoy the off season, get better, the pac 10 is yours for the taking and the potential for another deep run!

  11. dawgiedaddy’s avatar

    Tough way for a great post-season run to end. Obviously we didn’t play our best, but of course WVU had a lot to do w/ that.

    I don’t understand the writer’s need to trash Venoy Overton. He made some critical mistakes last night, no doubt, but he has been a huge part of our success this year and last, due to his D, speed and clutch free-throw shooting. Yes, he forces things on the break when we don’t have numbers sometimes, but that is by design, and it works more often than not. Venoy is not an elite floor general–that’s not what he does. He’s a sixth man. An energy guy who disrupts the other team’s offense at the top, and pushes the pace of the game. That’s his role. Calling a player “VO the walking TO” is not constructive criticism.

    At any rate, I think the fact that Romar’s teams have been unable to get past the Sweet 16 is due to a number of reasons, but three really strand out to me.

    1) We never seem to be strong when the Pac10 is really strong. In ’05 and ’09 the league was mediocre, while we were very good. In ’04 and this year, we had good teams while the league was historically bad. In ’07 and ’08 the pacx was arguably the best league in the country, but we didn’t make the Tournament either year. In ’06 the Pac10 was good (though not great), and we were good. This was the year that we came the closest to breaking through, and in fact we would have, if not for some horrific officiating and Mike Jensen’s famous blunder.

    You look at the teams in the Final Four most years and they typically come from the top conferences in the country. They face top-notch competition night-in and night-out, and they ususlly face a wide array of different styles of play and strenths and weaknesses. Obviously those teams are better prepared for the Tournament. When we faced West Virginia, we really hadn’t seen a team like that all season. Sure, SC was similar in some ways, but not not nearly as tough, talented, or deep.

    2) We have never benefitted from an upset in the opposite part of our bracket. In 5 NCAA appearances, four second-round games and three
    Sweet 16 appearances, UW has played the highest-seeded team we could have faced in every single second- and third-round game, during the Romar era. Upsets in other games played a major role in Arizona and Gonzaga’s Sweet 16 runs last year, Oregon’s Elite Eight run in ’07, and our one Sweet 16 run under Bender in ’98. I’m not using this as an excuse, but it sure would have been nice to play, say, St. Mary’s instead of West Virginia. If we’d been in the South region, it could have happened like that.

    3) We always seem to get beat when we face elite teams w/ size and depth on the front line. We have great perimeter players, but none of Romar’s Tournament teams have had much size up front. You may be able to get away w/ that in the pacx (especially during the down years for the league), but when you come up against the top teams from the Big East, ACC, Big 12 and Big 10, you get exposed, and usually eliminated.

    This is really quite a dilemna when you play at such a fast pace, like Romar’s UW teams do. Big, slow guys like Wolfinger not only slow your break down, but more importantly can’t defend in the Dawgs’ base super-agressive, overplaying, trapping man-to-man D. Their helps and rotations are too slow, they can’t hedge on screens and recover, and the half-court defense breaks down. On the other hand, true bigs (6’8″ and up, w/ wingspan and muscle) w/ offensive skills, who can run the floor and have lateral quickness, are a rare commodity. There’s usually intense competition for them, and when you do get them, they often have VERY short college careers. But these are the guys you need, to get you over the top. And this is why I don’t understand the people who say that one-and-done’s are bad for your programs. Romar gets great four-year players who develop. He gets great wings and small guards. And his teams develop chemistry over time. But they never have bigs w/ the talent to get us to the Final Four.

    If only that ’04-’05 team had Marvin Williams. If only Spencer Hawes had been a year older. Let’s hope we can get Terrance Jones. He won’t need to stick around that long to have a major impact.

  12. Ike’s avatar

    “No more recruiting PF’s at 6 6″ that are slow and fat.”

    Who on our team fits that description?

  13. dawgiedaddy’s avatar

    Breshers. Hopefully the description is different next year.

Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>